Uber and Lyft May Suspend Operations in California
Tomorrow Marks an Important Deadline
Uber (UBER) and Lyft (LYFT) have been battling with the state of California for most of this year. Now, the conflict is coming to a head. In January, California enacted Assembly Bill 5, a law designed to give gig workers employment benefits. Since the law took effect, Uber and Lyft have continued to treat their drivers like contractors, rather than like employees.
On August 10, a California judge mandated that the companies classify their drivers as employees, and gave them 10 days to appeal the decision. Uber and Lyft’s leadership warned that they might temporarily stop their business in California, starting tomorrow, if the order stays in place.
Contractors or Employees?
Uber and Lyft have long classified their drivers as contractors. Drivers cover their own vehicle upkeep costs, and do not receive unemployment insurance, overtime pay, or other benefits. The rideshare companies said this model gives drivers flexibility to make their own schedules. Uber and Lyft also argue that they are tech platforms used to connect drivers and passengers, not transportation companies employing drivers.
The companies have made changes to their business models to give drivers more power, like letting them see fares and decline rides before picking up passengers. These kinds of moves solidify drivers’ independence, but also make them more like contractors than employees.
Critics of the companies say their contractor models place unfair burdens on drivers and make it difficult for transportation businesses that follow employment laws to compete with them.
Though Uber and Lyft are fighting California’s regulations, they are also beginning to make plans for how to adapt their businesses if they are required to treat drivers as employees.
They are considering adopting a franchise-like business model. This way, other companies could develop transportation fleets using their technology. Independent companies would handle employee benefits, and Uber and Lyft would be purely technology providers. FedEx (FDX) uses a similar franchise model for some of its delivery operations, and Uber already shifted to this structure in Germany and Spain due to regulations.
The companies are also looking toward November when a law exempting them from AB-5 will be on ballots in California. For now, however, it’s a tense week for Uber and Lyft. The companies’ investors, as well as drivers and passengers who use the platforms, will be closely following what happens in California.
Please understand that this information provided is general in nature and shouldn’t be construed as a recommendation or solicitation of any products offered by SoFi’s affiliates and subsidiaries. In addition, this information is by no means meant to provide investment or financial advice, nor is it intended to serve as the basis for any investment decision or recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Keep in mind that investing involves risk, and past performance of an asset never guarantees future results or returns. It’s important for investors to consider their specific financial needs, goals, and risk profile before making an investment decision.
The information and analysis provided through hyperlinks to third party websites, while believed to be accurate, cannot be guaranteed by SoFi. These links are provided for informational purposes and should not be viewed as an endorsement. No brands or products mentioned are affiliated with SoFi, nor do they endorse or sponsor this content.
Communication of SoFi Wealth LLC an SEC Registered Investment Advisor
SoFi isn’t recommending and is not affiliated with the brands or companies displayed. Brands displayed neither endorse or sponsor this article. Third party trademarks and service marks referenced are property of their respective owners.