Though the words “shareholder” and “stakeholder” are sometimes used interchangeably in conversations about investing, there are important distinctions between the two.
Both shareholders and stakeholders may have a vital interest in how a company is run. But the perspective, priorities, and rights of someone who owns shares of stock in a business can be very different from those of a person who has a different kind of stake in the company’s operations—as an employee, community member, or through some other connection.
Analysts and academics have long debated which group a company has a greater responsibility to when doing business—especially when their priorities may conflict. And there seems to be no end in sight to the controversy.
The shareholder vs. stakeholder debate continues to evolve as the push for good corporate citizenship and social responsibility gains momentum both nationally and globally. Here’s a look at what’s involved and the differences between a shareholder and a stakeholder.
What Is a Shareholder?
A shareholder is a person or organization that is invested in a public company: They own one or more shares of stock in the business and have an interest in how its success or failure might affect the value of their investment.
Individual shareholders might buy stock with a plan to hold on to the investment for the long term as part of an overall portfolio strategy. Or they might plan to sell within a few weeks or months, hoping to make a quick profit on their purchase.
Shareholders also may buy different types of stock depending on their goals. Those who buy common stock (the more popular choice) are more likely to be interested in the potential for higher profits, albeit with more risk. Those who purchase preferred shares are typically looking for reliable dividend income with less risk.
The rights and privileges of shareholders also may vary, depending on the company and the type of investment they make. Owners of common stock, for example, have voting rights, which can give them a say in electing board members and in some corporate policy decisions.
Preferred shareholders don’t have voting rights, but they do have priority when it comes to receiving dividend payments, and they’re more likely to get some money back if a company goes belly up.
Either way, that investment is liquid: Stockholders can sell some or all of their shares in a company and get out at any time. And either way, shareholders’ main goal is usually to get the most for the money they’ve invested in the company.
What Is a Stakeholder?
OK, here’s where things might get a little confusing. Shareholders are stakeholders—they have a stake in the company’s profitability, and in that context, they care about its financial performance and its reputation. But not all stakeholders are shareholders.
There are other stakeholders—people and organizations that don’t necessarily own a single share of stock in a company—that still may be affected by how the business operates. They might be vendors who supply the business with goods or services. They might be employees who depend on the steady wages and benefits they receive.
They might be bondholders who’ve purchased company debt with the expectation that they’ll receive interest payments as promised. Or they might be community members who rely on the revenue the business brings to their city or town, or who are concerned about the environmental impact (good or bad) they’ll see over time.
One of the key differences between these stakeholders and company shareholders is that stakeholders may not have the option of severing their ties and moving on quickly if they’re unhappy with how the business is doing. And they don’t have voting rights, so they don’t have the same opportunity to influence corporate policy that shareholders do.
Stakeholders do, however, have an interest in how the company operates and if it succeeds long term. Their livelihood and lifestyle may depend on it.
Stakeholders and Shareholders: Differing Points of View
Though both shareholders and stakeholders have an interest in how a company operates, they can sometimes have conflicting perspectives about what success looks like.
Shareholders generally want to see a company they’ve invested in do what it takes to increase share price, provide robust dividends, and improve profitability. Stakeholders usually want the company to stay financially healthy as well.
But their concerns might also be focused on employee wages, safety and working conditions, ethical practices, community outreach, charitable giving, and other factors. And stakeholders may be more likely to value long-term stability over short-term profits.
These differing perspectives are often referred to as “shareholder theory” and “stakeholder theory.”
What Is Shareholder Theory?
Introduced by economist Milton Friedman in a 1970 New York Times article , shareholder theory (also known as the Friedman Doctrine) argues that the primary responsibility of a corporation’s executives is to satisfy the desires of the company’s shareholders.
According to Friedman, a public company’s executives are employees or “agents” and, as such, should be prioritizing and delivering what the company’s owners—its stockholders—want.
In most cases, Friedman said, that means maximizing profits. And executives shouldn’t feel obligated or motivated to spend company resources on social responsibilities unless the shareholders tell them to or it benefits the bottom line.
Under the shareholder theory, managers are still expected to operate legally and ethically as they strive to increase returns. But the shareholders’ wants and needs supersede those of other stakeholders connected to the business.
That doesn’t mean corporate executives can’t contribute their own time or money in socially responsible ways. “As a person, (an executive) may have many other responsibilities that he recognizes or assumes voluntarily—to his family, his conscience, his feelings of charity, his church, his clubs, his city, his country,” Friedman wrote in the Times.
But those actions should be taken as an individual, Friedman wrote, not as an agent of a public company using stockholder money.
Stakeholder theory, usually credited to Dr. R. Edward Freeman, a professor of business administration at the University of Virginia, takes an alternative view to the Friedman Doctrine. In his 1984 book, “Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach,” Freeman said that to be successful, a business must create value for all stakeholders—not just those who own stock but all those who might be affected by company decisions.
That might mean considering whether to move forward with a merger or acquisition that could result in layoffs. Or rethinking a decision to relocate and take jobs to another state or country.
Or deciding whether to use an overseas supplier that can provide goods or services at a lower cost to customers but also with a lower quality. Increasingly, it may mean keeping in mind how a decision might affect the environment—by taking away green space, for example, or creating more traffic or pollution.
Considering the needs of all stakeholders doesn’t require executives to ignore profitability, proponents of the stakeholder theory argue—it’s just that profitability shouldn’t be the only factor of significance.
But critics of the stakeholder theory counter that a company that tries to please everyone ultimately pleases no one, and the business could be damaged in the effort.
A Move Toward Socially Responsible Decision-Making
As the idea of good corporate citizenship continues to gain ground globally, a growing number of companies have begun assessing decisions based on their responsibilities to society and not just their shareholders.
In 2010, the International Organization for Standardization created voluntary standards (guidelines, not rules) designed to help companies that wish to put corporate social responsibility policies in place.
And in 2019, the Business Roundtable, a nonprofit association of U.S. CEOs, grabbed headlines when it announced a new commitment to delivering value to all stakeholders, not just shareholders.
For decades, the Business Roundtable has endorsed the principle of shareholder primacy. But the group’s new Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation widens that approach, and outlines specific commitments to customers, employees, suppliers, communities, and shareholders. It was signed by 181 CEOs.
Individual investors also appear to be moving toward making portfolio decisions that take broader stakeholder needs into account.
Those who might wish to invest in companies whose socially conscious policies align with their own values can do so with specific stocks, or through a growing number of exchange-traded funds and mutual funds that follow environmental, social, and governance criteria.
A shareholder’s primary goal may still be to get the best return possible from an investment. But with an ever-widening range of choices available, investors who prefer socially responsible companies don’t necessarily have to accept lower returns in exchange for following their heart.
And if their stock gives them an opportunity to vote for board members or on policy, those shareholders also may enjoy the satisfaction of having a small say in how a company is run.
A Fee-Free Investment Option
Investors who like the idea of a company or fund that’s committed to good corporate citizenship and taking care of all its stakeholders may wonder where to start. They could research the possibilities if they have the time and expertise.
Or they could hire a professional money manager to do it for them—but might end up paying fees that could eat away some of their returns.
Another option might be to check out what SoFi Invest® has to offer.
With SoFi Invest®, investors can be pretty much as hands-on or hands-off as they like. Investors can choose their own stocks and ETFs or they can sign up for automated investing and let SoFi® build a portfolio for them.
Either way, investors can get professional guidance any time from experienced advisors. And they can get help shaping a portfolio around their investing goals, whatever they might be.
Another big plus: There are no trading fees when buying and selling stocks with a SoFi® investment account.
Investors don’t have to have a small fortune saved up to buy into the companies they like. Stock Bits enables investing without committing to buying a whole share.
The information provided is not meant to provide investment or financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on an individual’s specific financial needs, goals and risk profile. SoFi can’t guarantee future financial performance. Advisory services offered through SoFi Wealth, LLC. SoFi Securities, LLC, member FINRA / SIPC . The umbrella term “SoFi Invest” refers to the three investment and trading platforms operated by Social Finance, Inc. and its affiliates (described below). Individual customer accounts may be subject to the terms applicable to one or more of the platforms below.
Stock Bits is a brand name of the fractional trading program offered by SoFi Securities LLC. When making a fractional trade, you are granting SoFi Securities discretion to determine the time and price of the trade. Fractional trades will be executed in our next trading window, which may be several hours or days after placing an order. The execution price may be higher or lower than it was at the time the order was placed.
If you invest in Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) through SoFi Invest (either by buying them yourself or via investing in SoFi Invest’s automated investments, formerly SoFi Wealth), these funds will have their own management fees. These fees are not paid directly by you, but rather by the fund itself. these fees do reduce the fund’s returns. Check out each fund’s prospectus for details. SoFi Invest does not receive sales commissions, 12b-1 fees, or other fees from ETFs for investing such funds on behalf of advisory clients, though if SoFi Invest creates its own funds, it could earn management fees there.
Third Party Trademarks: Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards Inc. (CFP Board) owns the certification marks CFP®, CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™, CFP® (with plaque design), and CFP® (with flame design) in the U.S., which it awards to individuals who successfully complete CFP Board's initial and ongoing certification requirements.
Investment Risk: Diversification can help reduce some investment risk. It cannot guarantee profit, or fully protect in a down market.
Automated Investing—The Automated Investing platform is owned by SoFi Wealth LLC, an SEC Registered Investment Advisor (“Sofi Wealth“). Brokerage services are provided to SoFi Wealth LLC by SoFi Securities LLC, an affiliated SEC registered broker dealer and member FINRA/SIPC, (“SoFi Securities”).
Active Investing—The Active Investing platform is owned by SoFi Securities LLC. Clearing and custody of all securities are provided by APEX Clearing Corporation.
For additional disclosures related to the SoFi Invest platforms described above, please visit https://www.sofi.com/legal/.
Neither the Investment Advisor Representatives of SoFi Wealth, nor the Registered Representatives of SoFi Securities are compensated for the sale of any product or service sold through any SoFi Invest platform. Information related to lending products contained herein should not be construed as an offer to sell, solicitation to buy or a pre-qualification of any loan product offered by SoFi Lending Corp and/or its affiliates.