Table of Contents
For decades, the SWIFT network has been the backbone of cross-border transactions, helping financial institutions communicate payment instructions across continents. But over the past several years, blockchain technology has emerged as a powerful alternative, promising faster settlement, lower fees, and unprecedented transparency.
Understanding how these two systems compare — and how they continue to evolve — can help consumers and businesses make smarter decisions about their international money transfers.
Key Points
- SWIFT is a global messaging system that enables banks to communicate payment instructions securely.
- Blockchain provides a decentralized ledger where value can be transferred directly without relying on multiple intermediary banks.
- SWIFT’s challenges include limited speed, higher costs, and reduced transparency; blockchain aims to address these issues.
- Innovations such as SWIFT GPI and SWIFT’s planned blockchain shared ledger show the network is evolving.
- The future of cross-border payments may combine traditional banking rails with blockchain-based settlement systems.
What Is SWIFT, and How Does It Work?
The Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) was founded in 1973 to replace slower, less secure forms of interbank communication. Today, it connects more than 11,500 financial institutions across over 200 countries and territories.
SWIFT Is a Messaging System, Not a “Mover” of Money
SWIFT facilitates the information exchange that enables international money transfers. It transmits specific payment instructions — such as sender, recipient, amount, and currency — between banks in different countries. However, it does not move money itself. Actual funds move through a series of institutions known as correspondent banks, not through the SWIFT network.
The Role of Correspondent Banks in SWIFT Payments
Because SWIFT only sends messages, the actual movement and settlement of funds occur electronically through a system of correspondent banks that hold accounts with each other. A single cross-border transfer may pass through multiple correspondent banks. While this system is secure and time-tested, each intermediary can introduce fees, complexity, and potential delays.
What Are the Main Challenges of the SWIFT System?
SWIFT has been critical to global finance for decades, but it carries certain limitations:
- Speed: Traditional SWIFT transactions, such as wire transfers, typically take three and five business days, depending on the number of intermediaries involved.
- Cost: Each correspondent bank may charge processing fees, and foreign exchange markups can add significantly to the cost.
- Transparency: It can sometimes be difficult to track where funds are in the transfer process and delays are not always clear.
- Operating hours: Payments are subject to each correspondent bank’s local hours, bank holidays, and time zones, which can lead to delays.
How Does Blockchain Fit Into Cross-Border Payments?
Blockchain offers a fundamentally different model for cross-border payments.
A Decentralized Ledger for Value Transfer
A blockchain is a transparent, tamper-resistant ledger maintained by a decentralized network of computers. It enables direct peer-to-peer transfers, supports near real-time settlement, and provides an immutable transaction history.
Rather than messaging instructions to move money, blockchain allows the value itself to be transmitted digitally.
Each network participant stores a copy of the ledger. This ensures decentralization and helps prevent any unauthorized changes. Validators confirm transactions, create blocks (records of transactions), and maintain consensus, receiving fees for securing the network.
This model eliminates the need for central clear authorities, reducing settlement time, lowering costs, and offering full transparency.
Recommended: Tips for Safe International Transfers
How Blockchain May Solve SWIFT’s Challenges
Blockchain addresses some of the pain points of the SWIFT system:
- Speed: Blockchain money transfers typically settle in under three minutes.
- Cost: Because it eliminates multiple intermediaries, blockchain is usually a more affordable way to send money internationally.
- Transparency: Each transaction is recorded on a public ledger.
- Operating hours: With blockchain, international money transfers aren’t limited to regular banking hours. You can send money online any time, any day.
Are We Talking About Bitcoin or Something Else?
While Bitcoin can be used for international transfers, it’s generally considered too volatile for everyday payments.
Blockchain-based money transfers today typically use stablecoins, which are digital tokens tied to traditional fiat currency (like the U.S. dollar or a euro). Stablecoins help minimize volatility risk.
Some payment apps also use the Bitcoin Lightning Network behind the scenes to provide fast, low-cost payments. The app instantly converts to and from Bitcoin automatically, so users never directly hold the cryptocurrency.
Send cash in a flash with worldwide money transfers.
Blockchain vs. SWIFT: A Head-to-Head Comparison
The table below shows the key differences to note when comparing SWIFT vs. blockchain for cross-border payments:
| Feature | SWIFT | Blockchain |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | 3 to 5 business days | Seconds to minutes |
| Cost | Multiple bank fees + high foreign exchange markup | Lower, more transparent fees |
| Transparency | Limited and bank-dependent | High; shared ledger |
| Security | Strong but reliant on banks’ systems | Strong, but user and wallet risks exist |
| Accessibility | Bank hours | 24/7 availability |
Speed and Settlement Time
Blockchain offers near-instant settlement, while SWIFT transfers can take days due to intermediary processing.
Transaction Costs and Fees
Fees for blockchain money transfers are generally smaller and more predictable. Traditional SWIFT transactions accumulate intermediary charges and currency conversion markups.
Transparency and Traceability
SWIFT tracks messages, not money movements. Blockchain provides real-time transaction visibility on a shared ledger.
Security and Risk
Both systems are considered secure but in different ways:
- SWIFT uses strong encryption and authentication for secure messaging but relies on the security of member banks to keep funds safe.
- Blockchains use cryptographic validations and decentralized storage to make data resistant to tampering. However, blockchain wallets can be vulnerable to hacking if not properly secured.
Accessibility and Operating Hours
SWIFT transactions depend on bank availability. Blockchain networks operate continuously without regard to time zones or holidays.
How Is SWIFT Reacting to Blockchain? Understanding SWIFT GPI
SWIFT has been modernizing its infrastructure to remain competitive in a rapidly changing payments landscape.
What Is SWIFT GPI (Global Payments Innovation)?
Launched in 2017, Swift GPI (which stands for Global Payments Innovation) aims to improve the speed, transparency, and traceability of cross-border payments.
SWIFT GPI allows many transfers to settle within hours (some within 30 minutes), and all GPI payments settle within 24 hours. GPI also offers real-time tracking and confirmed delivery. More than 4,450 financial institutions around the world currently use it.
How SWIFT GPI Aims to Compete With Blockchain/
SWIFT GPI brings significant improvements, but SWIFT’s newer initiative goes a step further: integrating blockchain features directly into its infrastructure.
In September 2025, SWIFT announced that it would introduce a blockchain-based shared ledger developed in collaboration with over 30 global financial institutions. The ledger is intended to complement existing messaging services — not replace them.
This new blockchain component aims to provide:
- Real-time, 24/7 international payment capabilities
- Support for digital assets, including stablecoins and central bank digital currencies CBDCs
With this move, SWIFT is effectively adopting the strengths of blockchain while retaining the regulatory trust and global reach of its existing network.
Is Blockchain Really the Future of Cross-Border Payments?
Blockchain is promising, but widespread adoption depends on overcoming several obstacles.
Hurdles for Blockchain Adoption (e.g., Regulation, Scalability)
Key challenges include:
- Regulation: Many jurisdictions still lack clear rules for blockchain-based payments. Varying standards mean that compliance in one country might not be sufficient for another, slowing down transactions and onboarding processes.
- Scalability: Public blockchains can face congestion. Not all networks support high-volume payments reliably.
- Interoperability gaps: Connecting different blockchain networks with each other and with existing, legacy financial infrastructure remains difficult.
- User experience and understanding: The technology’s complexity and lack of common knowledge can create adoption barriers.
The Rise of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs)
CBDCs — digital versions of government-issued currency — may accelerate blockchain-based payments.
Unlike private cryptocurrencies, CGDCs are government-controlled and central bank-guaranteed, making them a risk-free digital form of money. They aim to improve financial inclusion and modernise payment systems.
Many central banks — including the U.S. Federal Reserve — are researching or piloting CBDCs.
Why the Future Might Be Co-Existence, Not Replacement
Rather than one system replacing the other, a more realistic outcome may be hybridization where:
- SWIFT continues modernizing and adopting distributed ledger technology
- Banks use blockchain for settlement while still relying on SWIFT for messaging and regulatory compliance
- Stablecoins and CBDCs provide new digital payment rails
Each system offers unique strengths: SWIFT excels in regulatory reliability and global reach, while blockchain offers efficiency, speed, and transparency.
What to Watch For in 2026
Several trends may shape the future of financial services:
- SWIFT’S deeper integration of block-based shared ledgers
- Growth of stablecoin payment networks
- Expansion of CBDCs and cross-border CBDC networks
- More consistent regulatory frameworks across major economies
These developments could make 2026 a pivotal year for global payments.
The Takeaway
The conversation may be shifting from “blockchain vs. SWIFT” to “blockchain and SWIFT.” Blockchain is reshaping global payments, while SWIFT remains an essential and trusted part of the financial system — one that’s evolving rapidly.
For businesses and consumers, this may mean faster payments, more predictable fees, better end-to-end visibility, and continued regulatory safeguards. The future of cross-border payments will likely blend the strengths of both systems.
SoFi Checking and Savings members can now send money to 30+ countries, including Mexico, India, Brazil, and more. Plus, make three international money transfers by 3/31/26 to earn $30 in rewards points.
SoFi worldwide money transfers are a fast, affordable, and simple way to transfer money to loved ones abroad — directly from the SoFi app.
FAQs
Is SWIFT a blockchain?
No, SWIFT is not a blockchain. SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication) is a centralized messaging network that allows financial institutions to securely exchange payment instructions. It is a communication system, not a ledger for holding or transferring value.
However, in 2025, SWIFT announced it would launch a blockchain-based shared ledger as part of its infrastructure.
What is actually replacing SWIFT?
No single entity is entirely replacing SWIFT. The future appears to be one of co-existence and evolution. Blockchain-based payment systems offer a powerful alternative, aiming to solve SWIFT’s speed and cost issues. However, SWIFT is also modernizing through initiatives like SWIFT GPI and its plan to integrate a blockchain-based shared ledger. Instead of a replacement, the market may be moving toward a hybrid model that blends SWIFT’s regulatory trust with blockchain’s efficiency.
Is blockchain cheaper than SWIFT for international transfers?
Yes, blockchain-based international transfers are generally cheaper than SWIFT. Blockchain eliminates the need for multiple intermediary correspondent banks, which each typically add their own fees to the transaction. By using a decentralized ledger, blockchain minimizes these third-party costs, which can lead to significantly lower transaction fees for cross-border payments.
What are the main risks of using blockchain for payments?
The main risks of using blockchain for payments involve wallet security, regulatory uncertainty, volatility of cryptocurrencies, and user-centric problems like losing private keys. Other challenges include integration with other blockchains and existing financial systems, and scalability (high fees and slow speeds during congestion).
Does SoFi use blockchain or SWIFT for money transfers?
SoFi uses blockchain technology (specifically Bitcoin’s Lightning Network via Lightspark) for its international money transfer service.
About the author
Timothy Moore
Timothy Moore is a personal finance writer and editor and a Certified Financial Education Instructor. His work has been featured on sites such as USA Today, Forbes, Business Insider, LendingTree, LendEDU, and Time. Read full bio.
Photo credit: iStock/ChayTee
Global remittance services are available to SoFi members through SoFi Checking and Savings. SoFi Checking and Savings is offered by SoFi Bank, N.A., Member FDIC. Transfers are subject to the terms of the SoFi Bank Deposit Account Agreement in effect at the time of payment. Fees, exchange rates, and estimated delivery times will be presented prior to payment confirmation. Service availability may vary by country or recipient.SOBNK-Q425-049