Something’s Gotta Give

You’ve heard me talk about “relationship problems” in financial markets in the past. It’s the phrase I use to point out when variables that typically behave a certain way in relation to one another are behaving outside those norms. Often the abnormal behavior is not the “problem” per se, but that these relationship problems don’t last forever and are likely to correct themselves – eventually.

One of the most stark relationship problems of this cycle is the one between real Treasury yields and price-to-earnings ratios (P/Es). I’ve covered this one before, but it’s a biggie and it remains dislocated, so it deserves to be covered again.

In a typical environment, these lines should move in similar directions and be closer together. (Note: the real yield is inverted on this chart, when yields are rising the magenta line falls). In other words, the spread between them should be tighter, and as real yields fall (i.e. the magenta line rises), P/Es should rise (i.e. the blue line rises). That’s what a more typical relationship would look like.

That’s not what’s happening right now: The gap between the two is currently very wide and does not appear to be narrowing.

Stock Valuations & Real Rates

This relationship problem presented itself between 2010 and 2016, although in reverse – P/Es were on the bottom and real yields were on top (i.e. negative). It took roughly seven years for the lines to converge, and just like in rocky relationships that do get better, it happened through a combination of both variables moving.

How long will it take for the gap to narrow this time, and will the lines ever fully converge again?

This Ends One Way Or Another

I am of the mind that this time is not different, and the two lines will converge again. Others are of the mind that this time is different, and suggest that some relationships are forever changed. I can agree that the details and drivers of market environments do change thanks to innovation (financial and technological), product mixes, demographics, and regulations, but many conventional rules of market behavior do not.

Regardless of which school of thought you land in, the argument is one that will continue into perpetuity. There are periods of time when each side will look “right” and others where each side will look “wrong”. You can make money in either case.

My expectation is that the gap between these two lines narrows slightly for a period of time before converging quickly and in a more dramatic fashion. The narrowing process could happen with the backdrop of a relatively healthy economy, sturdy profit margins, and fiscal and monetary policies that don’t present any major surprises. In that case, I’d expect real yields to fall and approach a level closer to 1% (currently 1.77%), and P/Es to compress slightly as earnings growth increases and market levels remain stable or even fall slightly.

We are roughly three years into this current dislocation, and as previously mentioned, the last major dislocation lasted six years. Perhaps we’re only halfway done, but there’s no knowing. What I do feel confident in is that the dislocation will end, one way or another.

Reading People’s Faces

If I were a gambler, I’d put my money on the P/E ratio being the element that has to move more than real yields. But that almost seems too easy. Of course it would make sense for some of the froth to come out of markets after three years (if we include 2025 YTD) of double-digit returns in the S&P and Nasdaq.

Nevertheless, I’m finding it very difficult to come up with ways the real yield would fall enough to narrow the gap. Particularly when looking at this chart of the nominal 10-year Treasury yield and real GDP growth.

Yields Usually Reflect Growth Expectations

In theory, the nominal 10-year Treasury yield should be close to the sum of real GDP growth and 10-year inflation expectations. Currently, the 10-year yield is at 3.97%, 10-year inflation expectations are at 2.28%, and the latest expectation for Q3 GDP growth from the Atlanta Fed is 3.9% annualized.

That admittedly simple math would suggest the 10-year Treasury yield should be closer to 6.2%, which would make the gap between the two lines even wider. So that can’t be plausible (famous last words).

What we’re left with is a gap that is likely to narrow at some point, and the best we can do is make educated guesses about how that might happen. If it is in fact the P/E ratio that needs to fall, we all better brush up on our poker skills of reading people’s faces… because after all, our moves in the stock market are highly dependent on what we think other people are going to do with the same information.

As they say, this too shall pass (perhaps we learned that by watching the gold market this week.) I’m positioning for this to last a while longer, and for the more likely scenario to be a compression in P/Es.

SoFi can’t guarantee future financial performance, and past performance is no indication of future success. This information isn’t financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on specific financial needs, goals and risk appetite.

Communication of SoFi Wealth LLC an SEC Registered Investment Adviser. Information about SoFi Wealth’s advisory operations, services, and fees is set forth in SoFi Wealth’s current Form ADV Part 2 (Brochure), a copy of which is available upon request and at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov. Liz Thomas is a Registered Representative of SoFi Securities and Investment Advisor Representative of SoFi Wealth. Form ADV 2A is available at www.sofi.com/legal/adv.

OTM2025102201