Fractured Front
The Federal Reserve's July meeting concluded with a decision that was both widely expected yet still surprising. As anticipated, the Fed held its benchmark federal funds rate steady in a target range of 4.25%−4.50% for the fifth consecutive meeting. The real story, however, was in the vote count. For the first time since 1993, two of the Fed's governors cast dissenting votes, arguing instead for a 25-basis-point cut.Number of FOMC Governor Dissents
The dissenters were motivated in part by the fear that the labor market is cooling more rapidly than the headline figures like jobs added suggest. Governor Christopher Waller — who is seen as a candidate to replace Chair Jerome Powell — has been particularly vocal, warning that private-sector job growth is "near stall speed" and that they “should not wait until the labor market deteriorates before we cut the policy rate”.
For those who voted to keep interest rates steady, the primary motivation is wanting more clarity on how tariffs will affect the economy. However, comments from Powell during the post-meeting presser suggest that clarity could take a while:
“But at the same time, there are many, many uncertainties left to resolve,” he said. “So yes, we are learning more and more. It doesn't feel like we're very close to the end of that process. And that's not for us to judge, but it feels like there's much more to come.”
An Economy of Two Tales
The divisions within the Fed are a direct reflection of mixed economic data that can be interpreted in different ways. On the surface, the latest report on Gross Domestic Product (GDP) painted a picture of robust health. The U.S. economy grew at a 3.0% annualized rate in the second quarter, above consensus expectations for growth of 2.4% and a welcome rebound from the 0.5% contraction in the first quarter. Beneath the surface, however, the picture gets more complicated. The GDP figure was artificially boosted by a massive 30.1% plunge in imports, which raised GDP by 5.7 percentage points (because net exports increased). In other words, the robust GDP print was less a sign of domestic strength and more a normalization after businesses frantically imported and stockpiled goods to get ahead of tariffs in the prior quarter. To get a more accurate gauge of underlying economic momentum, one can look at Final Sales to Private Domestic Purchasers (i.e. private domestic demand) which strips out government spending, trade, and inventories to isolate what consumers and businesses are doing. This measure tells a more sobering story: Entering the year at 2.9%, private domestic demand slowed to 1.2% in Q2 and is expected to slow even further next quarter.Real Private Domestic Demand
There’s something to the idea that the economy is showing some cracks, but it remains to be seen how much more economic pain the Fed would be willing to tolerate to get the inflation clarity it's looking for.
Investors Remain Optimistic, For Now
Despite everything, the U.S. stock market has remained remarkably buoyant. The S&P 500 has spent the month marching to a series of new all-time highs, powered by better-than-expected earnings results and relief that worst-case tariff scenarios were avoided. While the stock market reaction to the Fed's decision was muted — stocks finished the day mostly flat — the more telling reaction was from the bond market. The 2-year Treasury yield, sensitive to what the Fed does, ticked up by about seven basis points to end the day at 3.94%. Given Powell’s hesitance to hint at, much less endorse, a September rate cut, the move higher in Treasury yields isn’t a surprise. The age-old mantra for investors has been don’t fight the Fed. Yet in many ways that’s exactly what investors have been doing. Coming into Fed day, futures pricing indicated about a 65% chance of a rate cut at the September meeting. After the release of the Fed statement and post-meeting press conference, that has fallen to 47%.Probability of a September Rate Cut
In essence, investors have been siding with the dissenters, betting that weakening economic growth and no persistent tariff-related inflation will push the Fed to cut rates, regardless of its current rhetoric. This sets the stage for a data-dependent showdown over the next two months. If the next inflation reports show increasing tariff impacts, or labor data remains solid (we get a big update on Friday with the monthly jobs report!), it could force a rapid repricing of rate cut expectations beyond what we’ve already seen.
Want more insights from SoFi’s Investment Strategy team? The Important Part: Investing With Liz Thomas, a podcast from SoFi, takes listeners through today’s top-of-mind themes in investing and breaks them down into digestible and actionable pieces.
SoFi can’t guarantee future financial performance, and past performance is no indication of future success. This information isn’t financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on specific financial needs, goals and risk appetite.
Communication of SoFi Wealth LLC an SEC Registered Investment Adviser. Information about SoFi Wealth’s advisory operations, services, and fees is set forth in SoFi Wealth’s current Form ADV Part 2 (Brochure), a copy of which is available upon request and at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov. Mario Ismailanji is a Registered Representative of SoFi Securities and Investment Advisor Representative of SoFi Wealth. Form ADV 2A is available at www.sofi.com/legal/adv.